Check the Costs and Limits Before Paying by Phone

Updated October 2026
Licensed
usAvailable in US
Fast payouts
18+ Only

SMS deposits charge a mobile account rather than transferring money through the text itself, with billing and limits shaped by the network.

Smartphone beside a UK casino entrance illustrating SMS deposit payments

What Paying by SMS Means at a Casino

“Pay by SMS” describes a casino deposit funded through a mobile account rather than a bank card or bank transfer. In the UK, the method is commonly described as Pay by Phone. Boku is one service associated with this type of payment: the deposit is charged to the player’s mobile phone bill or deducted from available pay-as-you-go (PAYG) credit.

The wording can make the text message sound like the money itself. It is not. The SMS is part of authorising the payment; the cost is assigned to the mobile account. With a monthly contract, the charge appears on the phone bill. With PAYG, it comes out of the prepaid balance. That distinction matters because the payment source is the mobile account, even though the casino’s cashier is where the deposit is requested.

This makes a casino deposit by SMS different from sending a text that contains money, and different from paying through a card stored on a phone. The casino does not receive cash from the text message. Instead, the payment arrangement links the deposit to the mobile number and bills or deducts the amount through the network account. The phone is therefore part of the payment route, not merely a screen used to access the casino.

When looking for a casino that accepts SMS deposits, check that the payment method is currently available and review withdrawal information before signing up. The details below provide the payout speed available for each listed operator.

  1. Zombillion

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    The available payout information for Zombillion gives a speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  2. WinBeast

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    WinBeast has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  3. x3bet

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    The available payout information for x3bet gives a speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  4. SlotoSport

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    SlotoSport has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  5. NightWin

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    The available payout information for NightWin gives a speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  6. Revery Play

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    Revery Play has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  7. Amunbet

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    The available payout information for Amunbet gives a speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  8. BeOnBet

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    BeOnBet has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  9. Britsino

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    The available payout information for Britsino gives a speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

  10. SpinFormula

    Payout speed
    1-3 business days

    SpinFormula has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. No details about SMS deposits are provided.

For a contract customer, the charge is collected as part of the mobile account’s billing. It is not presented as an ordinary card transaction on the casino’s side. The player’s eventual cost is still real money, but it is recorded through the phone provider’s billing relationship. The timing of that charge may therefore feel different from a card payment: the deposit is associated with the casino account, while its cost is carried on the mobile account.

For a PAYG customer, there is no later monthly bill to absorb the deposit. The amount is deducted from prepaid credit instead. In practical accounting terms, the balance available for calls, messages or other mobile services is reduced by the casino payment. A deposit funded this way is not free credit or a casino-funded advance; it uses value already held on the mobile account.

The phrase “casino pay by SMS” can cover more than one provider or implementation. It names the general idea of authorising a payment through a phone-based process, not a guarantee that every casino uses Boku or that every mobile account will be accepted. Boku is a particular payment service within that broader category. The cashier’s payment label and the provider handling the charge determine what route is actually being offered.

The important financial difference is the account being charged. A bank-card deposit draws on a card account; a Boku deposit draws on the mobile account, either through the bill or prepaid credit. This can be useful for someone who wants to fund a casino account without entering card or bank details, but it does not change the character of the transaction: the amount still becomes a gambling deposit and remains payable through the phone account.

That arrangement also separates the casino balance from the mobile balance. Once a deposit is credited to the casino account, it is there for gambling under the casino’s account terms. The mobile bill or PAYG credit is the funding source, not a second casino wallet. A phone account is therefore not a place to hold casino winnings or manage a casino balance; it is the route by which a deposit is paid.

The expression “pay by SMS casino” can be misleading if read too literally. The message is associated with approval, while the charge itself is handled through mobile billing. The distinction is similar to separating an instruction to pay from the account that bears the cost. For a monthly customer, that account is settled through the phone bill. For a PAYG customer, it is the existing prepaid balance.

This model is why the method is often attractive to people who prefer not to use a card at the cashier: the mobile account can act as the payment source. It also explains its limits as a payment category. Its reach depends on the relationship between the casino, the payment provider and the mobile account, rather than on whether a phone can access the casino website. Having a working handset alone does not mean that every mobile account can fund every casino.

In short, Pay by Phone is a billing route for deposits, with SMS involved in the authorisation process. Boku charges the amount to a monthly phone bill or deducts it from PAYG credit. The text message is the visible part of the process; the mobile account is where the cost lands.

Why the Number of Boku Casinos Has Fallen

The number of UK online casinos accepting Boku deposits has declined since 2023. A small group of UK Gambling Commission-licensed operators still offers it, but direct Boku acceptance is no longer a feature that can be assumed across casino cashiers. The change is an operator-level retreat, not a named-method prohibition imposed across the market.

That distinction matters. The UK Gambling Commission did not introduce a specific rule banning Boku by name. Individual casino operators removed it because of compliance risk. The result for a player is similar in one practical respect: fewer places may offer the payment method. The reason, however, is different from a blanket regulatory ban. A casino can decide not to support Boku without a rule requiring every other casino to do the same.

Compliance risk is a commercial consideration as well as a regulatory one. An operator may assess whether a payment option remains suitable for its own arrangements and decide that continued acceptance is not worth the associated risk. That decision does not establish that Boku has become unlawful, nor does it mean every operator has reached the same conclusion. It explains how availability can contract while the method itself remains in use at some licensed casinos.

For people looking for online casinos that accept SMS deposits, the market therefore has two features at once: a small remaining selection and uneven availability. The first describes the scale of the choice; the second means that a method seen at one casino cannot be presumed to appear at another. Even a casino that has offered Boku in the past may change its payment offering. Acceptance is an operator decision, not a permanent characteristic of the casino category.

This also makes old references to casinos that accept Pay by SMS less reliable as a guide to present availability. A mention of Boku can describe a former cashier option rather than one that remains active. The broader label “Pay by SMS” can also obscure whether a casino accepts Boku specifically. For a search focused on direct Boku deposits, the useful distinction is between a payment method that is currently available and a past or general reference to mobile billing.

A shrinking field does not mean the remaining options form a stable group. Operator decisions can change, and the decline since 2023 is itself evidence that past availability is not a guarantee of future acceptance. A casino’s payment menu reflects its current arrangements; it does not bind the operator to keep every method indefinitely. That is why claims about a casino accepting Boku need to be treated as time-sensitive rather than as a permanent description.

The same point applies to broad statements that a particular type of online casino accepts SMS payments. Boku is not a universal feature of UK casino accounts, and the remaining supply is limited. A general description of a brand or market segment cannot establish that Boku is available in a specific cashier. The relevant question is whether the operator currently provides direct Boku deposits, rather than whether the casino has used mobile billing before or whether the phrase appears in an older description.

There is no contradiction between a regulator not banning Boku and operators removing it. Regulation sets requirements for businesses; operators make decisions about which payment arrangements to retain while managing their own compliance exposure. In this case, the Commission did not prohibit Boku by name, while some casinos chose to stop accepting it because of compliance risk. Conflating those two points turns an operator decision into a supposed market-wide rule.

For the remaining casinos that accept Pay by SMS in the UK, scarcity is the central availability issue. The decline does not support a claim that every casino has withdrawn Boku, because a small number of UKGC-licensed casinos still accept deposits through it. Nor does that remaining acceptance support a claim that the option is widespread. Both statements can be true: Boku remains available at some licensed operators, while the number of casinos offering it has been falling.

The practical market picture is therefore narrower and less predictable than a simple list of “Boku casinos” suggests. The payment method has not been banned by name, but individual operators have removed it in response to compliance risk. As those decisions accumulate, fewer casinos remain where direct Boku acceptance can be expected. Availability belongs to the operator’s current payment setup, not to the method’s status across the whole UK casino market.

The Deposit Flow: Amount, Number and SMS Confirmation

A Boku deposit begins in the casino’s cashier, not in the phone’s messaging app. The cashier is where the payment method is selected, the amount is entered and the mobile number is supplied. The SMS arrives later in the sequence, as a confirmation step. Keeping those stages distinct makes it easier to see whether a transaction has actually been authorised or is still waiting for action.

After signing in, the account holder opens the deposit area and looks for Boku or a Pay by Phone option. The label can vary between cashiers, so the relevant choice is the one that identifies payment through the mobile number. Selecting it should bring up fields for an amount and a phone number. If Boku does not appear in the cashier, there is no Boku transaction to complete there; a similar-looking payment label should not be treated as proof that the method is available.

Boku Deposit Process

  1. 1

    Select Method

    Choose Boku or the Pay by Phone option within the casino's cashier area.

  2. 2

    Enter Details

    Input the desired deposit amount and the mobile number associated with your handset.

  3. 3

    SMS Verification

    Receive the verification code via SMS and enter it into the confirmation field in the cashier.

  4. 4

    Confirm Result

    Verify that the cashier displays a completed deposit and that the funds are credited to your account.

The amount field is the first practical check. A specialist review describes Boku deposits in amounts divisible by ten, giving £10, £20 and £30 as examples. That is a reported denomination pattern, not a guarantee that every casino cashier presents the same choices. The amounts displayed by the operator’s own payment screen are the relevant ones for that transaction. If an entered amount is rejected, changing it to one of the displayed options is more useful than repeatedly resubmitting the same value.

The phone-number field needs equal care. The number entered should be the mobile number associated with the phone that will receive the verification message. A mistyped digit can send the confirmation request to the wrong number or prevent it from reaching the intended device. Before moving on, the number shown on screen should be checked against the handset being used for the payment. A number saved in an account profile is not necessarily the number entered into the payment form, so the cashier field still deserves a separate check.

Once the amount and number are entered, the cashier submits the request and the confirmation stage begins. Boku sends an SMS verification code to the supplied number. The code is used to confirm the transaction; it is not a second deposit amount or a separate payment. The code should be entered in the confirmation field associated with that request. If the message has not arrived, submitting another deposit request immediately can make it harder to tell which message belongs to which transaction.

The sequence is therefore: choose Boku in the cashier, enter an available amount, enter the mobile number, then confirm with the code sent by SMS. Each step has a different purpose. The cashier records the requested deposit; the phone number directs the verification message; the code confirms the request. Skipping or confusing one of those stages can leave the transaction incomplete even when the others appear correct.

A confirmation message should be matched to the deposit request currently on screen. If more than one message arrives, the code associated with the active request is the relevant one. If the cashier has been closed or the request has been cancelled, an old message should not be assumed to authorise a new payment. The safest reading is procedural: a code confirms only the request for which it was issued, not any later attempt made with the same number.

After the code is entered, the cashier displays the result of the attempt. A completed deposit should be distinguishable from a pending request or a rejected one. If the screen does not show a clear result, the account balance and transaction record can help establish whether the deposit was credited; repeatedly entering the same details does not resolve an unclear status. Where the cashier reports an error, the amount, number and code-entry step are the points to check before trying again.

The SMS confirmation is also a point to keep the transaction details private. The code is part of authorising a payment request, so it should not be passed to someone claiming to complete the deposit on the account holder’s behalf. The process is designed around the code reaching the supplied mobile number and being entered into the matching cashier session. A request to disclose it elsewhere is not another step in that sequence.

For a UK casino SMS deposit, the practical test is whether the cashier offers Boku, whether it accepts the selected amount and whether the verification message can be received on the entered number. The method is not completed merely by choosing it or filling in the form: the code confirmation is the final action in the payment flow.

UK Licensing Is the First Check, Not a Payment Feature

Pay by Phone availability says nothing by itself about whether a casino is authorised to serve customers in Great Britain. A payment option describes how money reaches an account; a gambling licence establishes whether the operator may offer remote gambling in this market. Treating the two as equivalent would confuse a cashier setting with the legal status of the business.

The UK Gambling Commission regulates commercial gambling in Great Britain, including remote casino services. Its remit applies to operators serving consumers in Great Britain even when the equipment used to provide the gambling is located elsewhere. The location of a company’s servers, offices or payment processing therefore does not replace the requirement for the relevant British operating licence.

The Commission issues operating licences to businesses and personal licences to individuals working in regulated roles. For a casino, the business licence is the relevant starting point: it concerns the operator offering gambling, rather than the particular payment method displayed in its cashier. A site accepting Boku or another SMS-based deposit route does not acquire a licence through that arrangement, and the payment provider does not stand in for the casino’s own authorisation.

This distinction matters when assessing casinos presented as places to make SMS deposits. A page may describe a site as accepting Pay by Phone, but that claim should be considered separately from whether the operator holds a current UK Gambling Commission licence. The licence check is not a ranking criterion or a feature that makes a deposit method safer by itself. It is a threshold check on the operator’s status in the market.

Before depositing, the operator’s licence number should be checked against the Commission’s public register. The register can be reached through the official UK Gambling Commission website at https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk. A logo or a statement on a casino’s own page is not a substitute for confirming the entry. The name of the licensed business should also correspond to the company operating the casino; a familiar brand name alone may not identify the legal entity.

The Commission is the regulator responsible for commercial gambling in Great Britain, rather than one of several competing licensing authorities for that market. Its role covers remote gambling offered to consumers there, regardless of where the technical equipment sits. That scope is why a foreign location should not be treated as an exception to the licensing check.

For someone comparing online casinos that accept pay by SMS, the order of assessment is straightforward: establish that the operator has the required current licence, then consider whether its payment arrangements fit the account’s needs. A mobile-billing option cannot repair a missing licence, just as a valid licence does not guarantee that a casino offers Boku. These are separate conditions, and each must be checked on its own terms.

Phone-Bill Charges, Transaction Caps and Daily Limits

A Boku payment can face two separate ceilings: the amount the casino is prepared to accept in one transaction, and any limit applied by the mobile operator. The lower applicable ceiling determines whether a deposit can proceed. A figure shown by the casino therefore does not, by itself, establish how much can be billed through the network.

For casino-side limits, specialist reviews describe £30 per transaction as the standard UK limit, while reporting that some casinos or network operators may permit £40 or £50. These are not universal allowances: the amount available depends on the particular service and can change. A casino may set a lower maximum than a network would permit, so a higher network allowance does not oblige the casino to accept a larger payment.

Published accounts of network limits do not agree on the per-transaction figure. Some specialist reviews give a network-level limit of about £10 per transaction alongside a £30 daily limit. Other accounts specify a £30 daily limit but do not identify a separate per-transaction cap. Those versions should not be combined into a single rule: the daily amount is reported consistently in those accounts, while the stated transaction ceiling differs or is omitted.

The distinction matters when several payments are considered within the same day. A casino’s transaction maximum applies to each payment it accepts; a daily network limit concerns the combined amount billed through the mobile account over that period. Reaching the casino’s limit for one payment does not establish that the network’s daily allowance has also been reached, and the reverse is true as well.

Daily Boku limits are enforced by the mobile operator rather than the casino, according to specialist payment reviews. The operator’s limit can therefore prevent a payment even where the casino’s cashier displays an amount within its own permitted range. The casino controls what it will accept; the network controls what it will bill. Neither figure should be treated as a substitute for the other.

For a UK SMS-billing casino, the practical ceiling is thus account-specific rather than a single market-wide number. The reported casino-side figures reach £30 as a standard limit, with some reports describing £40 or £50 allowances; network accounts cite a £30 daily limit but conflict over whether a separate per-transaction cap applies and what that cap is. These figures are reports, not a guarantee of the limit active on a particular account.

Mobile Networks and the PAYG Balance Ceiling

A mobile casino deposit depends on more than the payment option shown in the cashier. The mobile network must support the service, and the account type must be able to cover the charge. For Pay by Phone and Fonix, the supported UK networks are EE, O2, Vodafone and Three. That identifies network compatibility; it does not mean every casino offers either method to customers on all four networks.

EE

One of the supported UK networks for Pay by Phone and Fonix services.

O2

One of the supported UK networks for Pay by Phone and Fonix services.

Vodafone

One of the supported UK networks for Pay by Phone and Fonix services.

Three

One of the supported UK networks for Pay by Phone and Fonix services.

The distinction matters when a payment option is described as an SMS deposit or a phone-bill payment. Those labels do not establish whether the charge will be billed monthly or taken from prepaid credit. The account’s billing arrangement determines which balance is relevant. A PAYG customer has no monthly bill to add the transaction to, so the available prepaid credit becomes the practical ceiling.

A specialist payment review describes the Boku rule for prepaid accounts plainly: the deposit cannot be greater than the remaining phone balance. If the available credit is below the amount selected at the casino, the balance cannot cover the transaction. A visible payment option therefore does not, by itself, establish that a particular deposit can be completed.

For example, where a PAYG balance is £20, a Boku charge of £30 would exceed the available credit. The issue is not the casino’s displayed deposit range or a general daily limit; it is the amount left on the mobile account at the point of payment. Monthly-billed customers face a different account arrangement, because Boku charges can be placed on the phone bill rather than deducted from prepaid credit.

Network support should also be kept separate from casino availability. EE, O2, Vodafone and Three support Pay by Phone and Fonix, but a casino still has to offer the relevant payment service in its cashier. Likewise, the presence of Fonix on a supported network does not make it interchangeable with Boku at every operator. Compatibility has two parts: the mobile network and billing type must work with the payment service, and the casino must accept that service.

For anyone using PAYG, the balance is therefore a hard constraint on a Boku mobile casino deposit. A casino may accept the payment method while the transaction remains unaffordable from the available phone credit. Monthly billing avoids that particular prepaid-balance ceiling, but it does not remove the need for the chosen payment service and network to be supported.

How to Judge an SMS Casino When Options Are Limited

The useful test is not whether a casino advertises mobile payments in general, but whether Boku appears as a deposit option in its own cashier. “Pay by Phone” can describe more than one service, so a general mobile-payment label does not establish that direct Boku is available. The available UKGC-licensed choices are few, and the set has been shrinking since 2023; availability should therefore be treated as an operator-specific feature, not a permanent promise.

A suitable SMS casino site also needs to fit the account’s complete payment route. Boku can put money into a casino balance, but it cannot return winnings. An account funded this way therefore needs a separate, usable withdrawal method registered with the casino. If that second route is unavailable or unsuitable, the deposit option does not solve the payment requirement.

The practical comparison can be made against three conditions:

A valid UK Gambling Commission licence is a separate baseline check before depositing; it does not prove that Boku will remain in the cashier or that the method suits the account’s withdrawal needs. Those are distinct questions.

There is no defensible universal “best” SMS casino where availability and payment fit depend on the individual operator and account. A casino may be a reasonable choice for a deposit funded by phone billing and still be unsuitable for someone expecting to withdraw by the same route. The decision is therefore about the whole transaction path, not the convenience of making the first payment. When direct Boku is absent, a generic mobile-payment label is not a substitute for confirmation of the exact method.

Boku, Fonix and Siru: A Changing Mobile-Payment Mix

The payment label in a casino cashier does not always identify the same provider. Boku remains one route for charging a deposit to a mobile account, but it is no longer the only name associated with Pay by Phone. Since 2023, operator payment menus have shifted towards Fonix or Siru Mobile in some cases; elsewhere, the mobile-payment option has disappeared. The change is not a universal switch from one provider to another.

A specialist review of UK casino payment options identifies MrQ and Duelz as operators accepting Fonix, and Mr Vegas and Videoslots as accepting Siru Mobile. These examples show why a search for an SMS casino can produce results that do not accept direct Boku. A casino may support phone-billed deposits through a different service, while another may offer no phone payment at all. The provider name matters: “Pay by Phone” describes the broad payment type, not a guarantee that Boku is available.

That distinction is also relevant to mobile-network searches. O2 customers looking for an SMS casino should not treat a general Pay by Phone label as confirmation of Boku acceptance. The cashier’s listed provider is the more precise detail. Fonix is among the services supported by EE, O2, Vodafone and Three, but that does not establish that every casino using Fonix accepts every network in every circumstance.

For anyone comparing SMS casinos in the UK, the practical distinction is between direct Boku and an alternative mobile-payment provider. The replacement may preserve a phone-billed deposit route, but it is not evidence that Boku remains in the cashier. Payment menus can change, so provider information in a specialist review is a useful lead rather than a permanent inventory. The operator’s current cashier is the final check before treating any listed method as available.

The terms are not interchangeable. A result described as a top SMS casino may refer to a site with Fonix or Siru rather than Boku; that can still be relevant where the priority is paying through a mobile account, but not where direct Boku is required. A precise provider label prevents those two requirements from being mistaken for one.

Do

  • Check for the specific name Boku in the cashier
  • Ensure a separate withdrawal method is registered
  • Verify the operator holds a current UKGC licence

Don't

  • Assume "Pay by Phone" always means Boku is available
  • Rely on a mobile-payment label to guarantee withdrawals
  • Trust a brand name alone without checking the legal entity

Withdrawals and the Neteller Route

Boku can put money into a casino account, but it cannot receive winnings back. A casino balance funded by SMS therefore needs a separate route for withdrawals. The payment choice is incomplete if the account has no other withdrawal method registered: a debit card, e-wallet or bank transfer may be required, subject to the casino’s own cashier rules.

This distinction matters even when the initial deposit is small. The deposit method determines how funds enter the account; it does not automatically determine how winnings leave it. Before depositing, the account’s available withdrawal methods and any verification requirements should be checked. Otherwise, a successful Boku payment can leave the withdrawal step dependent on a method that has not been set up.

One possible workaround described in a specialist payment review is to add funds to Neteller using Boku, then deposit from Neteller at a casino that accepts it. This is an indirect route, not a Boku withdrawal: Neteller receives the mobile-funded amount, and the casino receives a separate Neteller deposit. Its availability depends on the services accepting Boku funding and on the casino supporting Neteller.

The route should not be treated as a way to bypass the casino’s payment conditions. The casino may require the payment account to be verified, and its withdrawal rules still govern how winnings are paid. The payment method used to deposit may also affect which withdrawal options are available, so the cashier terms need to be checked before funds are committed.

For an SMS payment casino, the practical comparison is therefore between direct Boku funding with a separately registered withdrawal method and the Neteller route where both services and the casino support it. Neither changes Boku’s deposit-only status. The relevant final amount is the withdrawable balance after the casino’s conditions have been met, not merely the amount credited following the mobile payment.

SMS-Funded Slots, Bonuses and the Terms That Change the Sum

A Pay by Phone deposit does not automatically qualify for a casino promotion. Bonus eligibility depends on the operator’s terms, so the payment method must be checked against the offer before the deposit is made. A specialist review reports that MrQ, Duelz, Mr Vegas and Videoslots accept pay-by-phone deposits for bonus eligibility; that is a reported position, not a permanent guarantee. The live promotion terms determine the result.

The value of a welcome offer depends on its match, wagering requirement and expiry conditions. One specialist review describes a common UK offer structure as a 100% match capped at £100, with wagering set at 35 times the qualifying amount. On a £10 qualifying deposit, a full match would add £10 in bonus funds. If the wagering rule applies to the combined £20 balance, the required turnover would be £700. The offer’s own wording matters: the calculation changes if wagering applies to the bonus alone, excludes the deposit, or uses a different qualifying amount.

Time limits can reduce the usable value further. A specialist review reports bonus funds expiring within 30 days and bonus spins within 72 hours. Those periods should be treated as offer-specific conditions to verify, rather than assumed to apply at every SMS casino site. A bonus that cannot be wagered before expiry contributes nothing to the final withdrawable balance.

Boku deposits generally do not come with a dedicated bonus, according to a specialist review. Where a welcome offer is available, the relevant terms should state whether Pay by Phone deposits count, which games contribute to wagering, and when the promotion ends. The deposit amount alone does not establish eligibility: the payment method and promotion rules together determine whether the advertised extra funds have any cash value.

How do I deposit with Boku at an online casino?

Select Boku in the casino cashier, enter an eligible amount and your mobile number, then confirm the payment with the SMS verification code. Deposits are charged to your phone bill or deducted from your PAYG balance.

Can I deposit by phone bill without Boku?

Yes. Some casinos offer other pay-by-mobile services, including Fonix and Siru Mobile; check the cashier to see which options the casino supports.

How does Boku work?

Boku uses your mobile account to fund a casino deposit: the charge goes onto your monthly phone bill or is deducted from your PAYG credit. An SMS code is used to confirm the payment.

How can I check whether Boku is available where I live?

Check the casino cashier for Boku and confirm that your mobile operator supports pay-by-mobile payments. In the UK, EE, O2, Vodafone and Three support pay-by-mobile and Fonix, but acceptance also depends on the casino.

What are the deposit limits at pay-by-mobile casinos?

Boku deposits are generally limited to £30 per transaction, with some casinos or networks allowing up to £40 or £50. Network-level limits are typically about £10 per transaction and £30 per day; PAYG deposits are also capped by your remaining phone credit.

Responsible Gambling

Content created by the «winkapks.org» team